![]() ![]() Last but not least the effort taken into physical extraction capabilities makes the solution as a whole more and more interesting in the field and seriously worth considering when deciding what mobile forensic tool to deploy. The generated reports are very easy to read for the non-technical/forensic persons involved in cases and the capability to read the competitor's proprietary file formats is a big pro. The very good plug & play functionality is very useful for non-forensic operators, the support for older devices and operating systems is a big benefit and thus it is good to just have MOBILedit Forensic Express as one of your essential tools, especially considering the extremely modest pricing of it. We use MOBILedit Forensic Express now to either validate results from tools like Oxygen, MSAB and Cellebrite as well as utilising it for what it does so excellent: partial (target oriented) extractions. ![]() In all honesty we moved away from MOBILedit Forensic for quite a while since the product did not meet our needs for a while, but since two years Compelson built the product almost from scratch and hit the market in a novel way: filling the gaps where the "big boys" missed out. Able to run Python scripts via plugins, and edit and create new decoding chains. Using the Python shell, enhances the capabilities for content decoding. MOBILedit Forensic was our first tool in house back in 2006 and with many competitors on the market we added several mobile forensic products to our portfolio. Highlights the exact position for each decoded content entry, enabling full tractability between the analyzed data and the Hex. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |